“Unreasonable” switch of funding method results in £1m of missed costs

June 27, 2019

A London firm lost its appeal against the decision to disallow its success fees and ATE premium after the firm changed to conditional fee agreement from legal aid funding. The judge argued that the firm was “bound by” its Legal Aid contract and that its application for more funding was “improperly constituted and inadequately formulated”. To read more please click here